Subscribe to RSS Feed
get latest updates on
site news and site posts

Solving the Perfect Crime, Backward, to My Opening Line

by David Niall Wilson 

I find myself in an odd position, at least odd for me. I almost always approach the plotting and creation of a new novel by starting with one element and branching out. For instance, when I wrote “The Mote in Andrea’s Eye,” it was because Trish asked me “Why have no hurricanes disappeared into The Bermuda Triangle?” When I wrote “Ancient Eyes,” I started with the desire to expand on the hill folk that were depicted in the movie Next of Kin. I wrote “The Fall of the House of Escher” because of the title. In every case, one thing led to the next, and I was ready to rock and roll. The rest of those stories fell into place almost magically.

Now I have one that is refusing to fit the mold. It started with the good old ‘what if?’ foundation that has served me so well in the past. I’m going to share some things here and hope that, if someone sees it and takes it before I get it into print, you’ll all remember where you heard it first. Hell, for reasons you’re about to read, I may never get the first line completed anyway.

I’ve seen a number of movies in recent years where the premise involves some form of time travel, or dimension shifting. I’ve read a ton of articles and commentaries on genetic research, DNA, and genetic memory. It all sort of gelled when I watched the recent movie DÉJÀ VU, and I thought…if the mind is a computer, and DNA is data, and the mind can access that data…what if the mind of one person could tap into the data in another person’s DNA? There was my ‘what if?’ - and I was off and running.

My basic premise came easy. There is a detective. He loses his partner in a particularly nasty crime that goes unsolved. Someone approaches the detective and explains that they might be able to help. They introduce him to a research group - very hush hush - that is working on just what I ‘what iffed’ upstream. They have found a way to allow someone, for a short period of time, to tap into the genetic memory recorded on another person’s DNA.

Here’s the thing. Even though this gives you theoretical access to a crime - assuming you can snag the proper DNA specimen from your victim, for instance - you can still only know what that person knew. You don’t’ get a magic window to the killer. You might also gain memories and knowledge from ancestors of the person you bonded with. In my version of this, the bond is tenuous and begins to break down after about forty-eight hours. This, then, would be the basic body / scope of a novel about this particular detective…he has 48 hours to solve a crime using bits and pieces of memory and knowledge known to one person from the crime scene…maybe time to do a second if he recovers fast enough, but of course there will be some danger in the process…reasons to go slow, and easy with it. It gives the detective an edge, but not everything.

When I got this far I thought to myself, self - this would make a great novel series, not to mention a TV drama series and a heck of a movie - very Philip K. Dicksian…very cool.

So I thought I’d sit down and write an outline and plot out the first book / pilot / whatever it turned out to be. I thought that several months ago. I don’t know the exact date, but my agent could possibly tell you as I sent him the idea almost immediately, all full of how I was going to set the world on fire - like I get from time to time. If you’re reading this, Bob, I bet you remember. That’s when it started to twist out of my grip, and that’s why I’m writing this essay on this topic, hoping that it will gel - come to life for me in some way I’ve missed, and allow me to plow on.

The problem is simple. When it came down to putting together the crime that would be solved -the crime that took the detective’s partner, or brother, or wife, or whatever, the damnable unsolvable crime was going to be…I had / have nothing. It would seem like almost any crime would do, but it won’t. It has to be something with levels of subtlety that can be brought out through bonding with the memories of the victim, who obviously didn’t see it coming, or they would not BE a victim. It has to be tragic enough to make a detective risk job, sanity, and his life to find the answer to it. In point of fact, what I’ve learned about this book is that it isn’t about the ‘what if?’ at all, but about the crime, and I didn’t bother to provide myself with such a crime when I was getting excited over my great new idea. In fact, I didn’t even bother to warn myself just how hard crafting that perfect crime might be, or how integral it was to the whole shooting match…

So here I sit, great whopping ‘what if?’ in hand, pounding my noggin on the desktop in search of the perfect crime. The moral of my story? Simply this…

Processes are imperfect, recalcitrant, hateful things that evolve very slowly into something unreliable enough to make you scream…and they are the foundation of our words. Be careful not to get too comfortable with the way yours works, because it’s a whole lot harder to revise that process mid-stream if you don’t keep your eyes open for possible pitfalls, and if you trust what has come before to lead you through what happens next.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to find the perfect crime - and solve it backwards to my opening line.

-DNW

Related Posts

  • Details

  • Writing and reading Serial Characters - Some thoughts

  • Ready or not, here I come.

  • Ravenous

  • Never Kill Your Child — or Bury Your Past

  • I’ve looked at clouds from both sides now

    Epiphanies are odd things.

    There I was, mumble thousand miles above the planet, laterally squished in my window seat by a fellow passenger with a well-endowed caboose which kept spilling into my space, staring out of the window, waiting for the flight to end (ladies and gentlemen, I love being in new places, but I loathe the getting there. Scotty, please invent that transporter thing already…)

    And there below me, a long, long way below, lay mountains and fields and rivers and roads and little smudges of towns clustered around intersections or river bends. And between me and the ground… were the clouds.

    Now, I was above the clouds, and I could see them clearly from my vantage point for what they were - wispy, insubstantial, many of them practically see-through, their edges ragged and unravelled, beautiful in their near-chaos, making sense to eye and mind on an aesthetic level as well as the purely physical stuff I knew about clouds from high school science classes. In molecular terms they barely existed - they were mist and promise, a fleeting congregation of water vapour and air and mystery, quickly formed, quickly gone, quickly forgotten or mistaken for others just like themselves. Beautiful, but hard to grip, hard to come to terms with, hard to describe, nebulous (that very word defines what they are - insubstantial, “cloud-like”). They are stories spun from nothing, they are made of nothing, a plane can fly through one without even noticing it is there. And yet you can look at one and know what kind of story it contains - a thunderhead, a snow-cloud, one of those puffy white jobs that dot summer skies so that the blue won’t get boring.

    And then my eye slipped down, through, below. And these wispy insubstantial, hard-to-grasp things floating in mid-air… cast shadows on the ground.

    And the shadows were nothing like the thing they reflected.The shadows were not wispy, insubstantial, unravelling at the periphery. The shadows were sharp - there was an edge to them, a line, and on this side of the line it was dark, and on that side of the line it was light. Down on the ground, it was uncompromising, clear, unequivocal. The ground did not know clouds like I knew clouds - it could not look at them from above and know what the true story was. It only knew what the clouds chose to tell - that they were present, or they were absent. What happened next, the ground found out for itself, the hard way. No prescience. No visual clues except the clarity of the dividing line between shadow and light.

    And thus, the epiphany.

    Stories are like this. When the writer first finds them, they’re hanging in the air like clouds do. They are drifty, pervasive, beautiful; their true nature is easier to see, because they are laid out below the writer’s eye and there are no secrets there. But the reader - the reader has to have the secrets. The reader also has to have a clarity of vision which enables those secrets to be understood. The writer’s job is to render the hard-to-grasp nebulosity of the story/cloud into the sharp clarity and understanding of the story/groundshadow, something that gives the reader a clear and comprehensible insight into the tale the writer is spinning, without ONCE letting go of the idea that the clouds THEMSELVES are still there, that there is a story beyond the story, that the writer needs to be bigger than their universe and see it all and understand it all and then give enough to the reader to give them the capability of understanding that part of it that the writer has seen fit to to show them, the particular shadow, the edge of shadow, in which a story lives.

    The story is what the writer makes the reader THINK they are seeing - the sharp shadow on the ground - rather than everything possible that the story can be - the drifting cloud in the sky.

    So, then. Which cloud carries YOUR story…?

    Related Posts

  • In Memory Yet Black and Twisted

  • When Is Enough Too Much?

  • Phase

  • Where Part of a Story Might Come From

  • Trick or Treat

  • In which I explain the inner workings of my mind with the cunning use of puppets

    GUILDENSTERN: We should be working.
    ROSENCRANTZ: On what?
    GUILDENSTERN: Well, I don’t know! On, um, hey, what about that story?
    ROSENCRANTZ: Which story?
    GUILDENSTERN: You know. That story. The one with the stuff.
    ROSENCRANTZ: [eye-roll] Oh, that’s helpful.
    GUILDENSTERN: Well, we should definitely be working.
    ROSENCRANTZ: And I repeat, on what?
    GUILDENSTERN: Look, this is unnatural, is all I’m saying.
    ROSENCRANTZ: It’s called a vacation. VA-CA-TION. Which we have earned, you twit. My carpal tunnels are still carping.
    GUILDENSTERN: Oh. Right.
    GUILDENSTERN: …
    GUILDENSTERN: Dammit, we should be working!

    [Lather, rinse, repeat]


    Unlike poor Rosencrantz (who obviously has an Underwood), I don’t actually have carpal tunnel problems (thanks largely to my workhorse of a Kinesis keyboard); otherwise, this is an accurate rendition of the inside of my head this month. It’s hard to take a vacation from writing for exactly the same reason that many people find it difficult to get any writing done if they aren’t taking a class or have some other form of external structure (e.g. NaNoWriMo). You have to train yourself to be self-starting. But once you’ve done that, you discover to your chagrin that there isn’t really much in the way of an off-switch. You can choose not to write. But you can’t choose to make Guildenstern shut up about it.And now I’m going to go work on that story. The one with the stuff.

    Related Posts

  • Bursting to Write

  • THE NONFICTION METHOD OF TEACHING FICTION WRITING - Part Two

  • All Those Awful Books That Get Published

  • MORT WAXES POETIC

  • He Said, She Said….

  • WHO STALKS THE STALKERS?

    OK. I have no idea what that means. I just want to get this thing rolling. Somehow, in some way, I am writing this at 11 PM on Sunday the 27th because I worked today at the plant. For eleven hours. Go figure. I went to bed last night expecting to dream of Erica the blonde pharmacist at Walgreen’s who makes certain I’m not skipping my bipolar meds (and maybe that’s a hint for me to ask her out, the fact that I’m taking my meds in a timely way). Thinking to myself, yea, rainy day Sunday, write the essay, work on the comic, nap, dream of Erica ,alternate between reading George Pelecanos and Lesbian Pirates From Outer Space…then the phone rang at 7 AM. And that was that. I’m going to get through this now, then flop down and most likely dream the entire 108 minutes of CARNIVAL OF SOULS within an hour of waking up (all the better to feel like complete roadkill when I dream that early in the morning; I can’t have dreams about zombies that make me get up at 3 AM and urinate like the average person…)

    Stalkers. A few weeks back, I mentioned to the SU group that I received an odd comment on one of my SU entries from 2007. I good-naturedly asked if anyone in the group had ever dealt with stalkers, or, what years ago might have been called “hangers on.” Well, one person I had never heard of was mentioned, and I again realized how out of the loop I am these days. I never even heard of the individual. I won’t mention her/his name because I am told she/he Googles her/himself regularly. I do the same, and somehow when I hit page 73, my name shows up alongside the phrase “sailor moon hentai penguins,” but there you have it. But there are many different ways to encounter the crazies that are crazier than we are, and I’m here to recount several instances of people who spend too much time up on Hard Rock Candy Mountain.

    I have participated in book signings at several locations here, the Printers Row Book Fair, the TwilightTales readings at the Red Lion, and at the late, lamented The Stars, Our Destination. Before I tell you about the “it doesn’t matter” girl, I will say that I once had a man come up to me at Stars to have me sign a copy of SPLATTERPUNKS. The guy showed interest in wanting to co-write a story with me, then told me he had never read a story of mine and did not know who I was. All this before I even finished signing the book or spoke a single word. The kicker is that the guy had an old-timey plaster cast on his arm, the fuzz was coming out of the thumb area, and this oozy stuff like melted mac and cheese was caking to the book as I handed it to him. He tried to make further conversation in the cramped book aisles, and I recall sticking my finger in my ear and pretending to be receiving messages from the mother ship. Never saw the guy again, but I still recall that mac and cheese, which is why I likely will eat a bug before I open up macaroni.

    The “it doesn’t matter” girl is another Stars story, though the origins starts about a year earlier. My chapbook PAINGRIN was published in 1993, and one night I received a call from *ahem* Stanislaus Darnbrook Colson Tal Emerson Lake & Palmer. He wanted to pass on the contents of a letter from some woman who lived in nearby Skokie, was deeply moved by my diary entries, and he gave me her phone number. Well, I had seen Griffin Dunne in AFTER HOURS, I should have known better. We talked a bit, she wanted to have lunch, it was a Friday during the summer, I thought what, I mean, WHAT could it hurt to meet her? She gave me an address off Clark and Kinzie. I’m thinking its that German restaurant now demolished. I see a big green building with no sign, no windows. Maybe it’s a trendy place with a side door, a back entrance. The sign to be read from the bridge or the elevated train. It was a methadone clinic. She comes out with this giant-size sippy cup of, I guess, methadone, and we go off jauntily to have lunch and run into her drug-addled friends. I’m thinking, boy, I am screwed. She is introducing me like I’m Jeremy Piven and she’s Drew Barrymore, only more like if her eyes were made of glass and made me think of John Barrymore, lying in a coffin with a sippy cup stuck to his embalmed lip. At one point, she went on the nod and I blew town.

    She found me. Hell, she knew my name. It’s not like I use the name Vinnie Cthulhu or Mitchum Marlboro Spartacus. So I’m at Stars signing YEAR’S BEST HORROR:XX, and I’m sitting next to my artist friend H. E. Fassl. She waves, Harry says “who she?” and I mutter “it doesn’t matter it doesn’t matter it doesn’t matter” before she shows up and slurs surprisingly coherent sentences to me. She started attending conventions, mostly hanging out with the goth crowd, and ended up becoming good friends with Karl Edward Wagner that last year of his life. I was at Yvonne Navarro’s house, one of her VonCons, when she called to tell me Karl had died. Then she went to live with R. Chetwynd-Hayes.

    But there is one guy I have never been able to shake, going on twenty years now. He has three names, as most serial killers do, and, well, yea, me, too. I first met him when I worked at a comics shop on Archer Avenue, and he was all into MK-ULTRA and mind control–the in thing for the summer of 1991, evidently–and he also told me that he worked on computer programs overseas. Being 1991, and being me, I thought he was designing the new Ms. Pac-Man. Then he started showing up at, yes, Stars Our Destination, and, yes, Printers Row, and then I’d get off the subway and walk above ground and he’d be riding by on his bicycle, fer cry-eye! This last did indeed happen, and I began to question my very reality. Phil Dick was alive and well and was writing about my life.

    I didn’t see him for months, and then he showed up at a TwilightTales reading. He explained in whispers that he had not been around because he had been working as a military contractor in Iraq. I couldn’t pretend I was getting transmissions from the mother ship with this guy, because he was piloting the damn mother ship! I sent Mort Castle a photo of this guy, who is in the background off a photo of Mort and I at World Horror 02 here in Chicago. Remind Mort it’s the guy in the bright green lei, trying desperately to get in on our conversation.

    I saw him two summers ago at Clark and Belmont simply because I chose to walk on the wrong side of the street, or so Phil Dick would want me to believe, and I was able to brush him off fairly quickly, as he did know I had a certain time frame to get my last el train home. Oh, I forgot to mention the time he walked into The Gallery Bookstore and I hid behind the stack of recent acquisitions until he passed by and I could sneak out.

    So those are my tales, my anecdotes, what have you. I’m certain there are other tales to be told, by some of you reading this, hopefully by nobody Googling this. Hell, someone might come across this entry simply by typing in ‘hentai penguins.’

    Until next time.

    Wayne Allen Sallee
    Burbank, Illinois 28 April 2008

    Related Posts

  • A CIRCLE OF MAGIC

  • STORYTELLERS UNPLUGGED - Ambition

  • MORT WAXES POETIC

  • DEFINING HORROR: Nine Musings on The Nature of Horror

  • DO YOU DO BLURBS?

  • Y’all Comes Back Now, You Hear?

    Recently, someone used the user review function over at amazon.com to pan my novel Firefly Rain. The book’s crime? Incorrect use of the word “y’all”. Apparently the way I’d trawled my y’alls did not jibe with the reader’s understanding of how y’all is supposed to be used, and as such, he had no use for the rest of the book as well. He gave the book two stars and made impolite noises on the way out, and that was that.

    Now, there are a couple of ways to respond to something like this. The easy way would have been to puff up my chest, print out copies of all of the nice user reviews, and fan myself with them vigorously while declaiming to all and sundry that the uncomplimentary reviewer has no bleepin’ idea what he’s talking about.

    But this, as they say, would be wrong. The guy read the book and he didn’t like it. He’s entitled. He’s also entitled to share his opinion, whether I agree with it or not, and at least he cared enough to post something. So, there’s nothing to see here.

    There are other options. I could dig up proof that the reviewer was in fact incorrect. I could post evidence demonstrating that I had in fact used “y’all” correctly, as defined by some arbitrary authority or other, buttress my argument with anecdotal evidence, and attempted to wage war over Amazon stars on the rarefied plains of pure logic and citation.

    This would also be the wrong thing to do. Once that debate starts, it never ends, and it sucks down time like a fourteen year old chugs down Mountain Dew. Reference, counter-reference, my cousin’s from Mississippi, well I know a guy from Tennessee, and away it goes and goes. There’s no closure there, no benefit and no reason to pursue it. Those who disagree most likely won’t be convinced by anything I can show, and I’m certainly not in a position go back and retroactively adjust apostrophes. There’s no win there.

    Or, I could ignore it. I could look at the other, positive reviews, tell myself it’s an aberration, and go on with my literary life as before.

    All together now: this would be another mistake.

    Why? Not because I particularly agree with the comment. If I did, I wouldn’t have written the book the way I did. In all honesty, I’ve been living in the South (or at least in areas surrounded by the South) for nigh unto thirteen years now, and from what I’ve seen the debate over the appropriate use of “y’all” – Is it singular? One of a group? Singular and plural? Singular, with “all y’all” used for the plural? – is about as heated and unlikely to get resolved as the argument over what would have happened if Stonewall Jackson hadn’t gotten himself shot at Chancellorsville. Right way, wrong way - it depends on whom you talk to. But even that is a diversion; the argument itself is a null issue. The correct usage isn’t what’s important here.

    What matters is that a reader felt I got something wrong, and by their lights, I did. From where that reader is sitting, I made a sloppy, inexcusable mistake, one that was bad enough to imply that I had done none of my research and thus nothing I wrote would be valid. By his lights, I used “y’all” wrong, and that was enough to discredit the rest of his reading experience.

    That’s it. End of story. Like I said, for purposes of this discussion, it doesn’t matter whether I was right, wrong, or just another goddamned carpetbagging Yankee looking to take advantage of the South to pocket a shiny nickel or two. We’re talking about something else here, something a lot bigger than me or thee or, dare I say it, y’all.

    The important thing is that I butted up against a reader’s understanding, their perception of the way things actually are. And once you go up against what a reader knows to be true, you can’t win. Either you agree, or you’re wrong, and if you’re wrong there goes any willingness that reader might have to buy into what you’re putting on the page.

    Digression – This is not unique to fiction writing. In fact, it’s something I run into in my video game work all the time. Everyone knows, for example, that tanks move very slowly. This is because they are large and made of metal, and in the World War II movies that formed a lot of popular opinion about matters military, tanks did the armored division equivalent of running like a catcher. So, the conventional wisdom is that Tanks Are Slow, and God save anyone who puts a fast tank in their game from the savaging they’ll get from critics and fans. Never mind that your average US main battle tank can cruise at around 45 MPH; everyone knows tanks are slow, and not delivering on that expectation is just asking for trouble. The expectation trumps the reality, and having that expectation violated - even by honest-to-Murgatroyd truth - detracts from the player’s experience. They’re getting cognitive dissonance instead of immersion because of that one detail that they know is wrong, and that hits the player’s enjoyment like a sock full of pennies to the back of the neck.

    It works on the other side, too, incidentally. I once had a collaborator on a fantasy-themed project tell me that “dwarves aren’t really like that!” when I tried to make them something other than axe-wielding ZZ Top impersonators with comedy Scottish accents. The image of the “truth” of this pop-culture mythical race was so strong to him that he couldn’t see them any other way, even when given carte blanche to do so. Think about it.

    All joking aside, though, I don’t mean to denigrate either the importance of reader perception or the depth of the issue. It matters what the audience thinks, and every time a creator gives them something other than what they were expecting, that creator is walking a tightrope between reader surprise and reader rejection. It bears repeating; if the reader has to adjudicate between what they read and what they know, then they are shunted outside of the narrative and become aware that they are in the act of reading a book. And if they’re aware that they’re reading, they’re not immersed in the story, and suddenly, the magic goes poof in a cloud of fractured pixie wings.

    What to do, then, what to do? It is impossible to know what every single potential reader thinks, and catering to all of those no doubt contradictory reader assumptions is purely impossible. On the other hand, it does make a certain amount of sense to stick a finger in the figurative wind and figure out what the audience’s preconceptions on your subject matter are likely to be. It makes more sense not to deliberately contravene those assumptions without good reason, and to acknowledge that you are in fact making a different choice. This can be as simple as having a character say “I thought all tanks were slow” and allowing an expert character to refute the point, but however you do it, you’re letting the reader know you’re aware of their potential issue and challenging them to change their views, instead of leaving them to disagree in solitude and grumbly silence.

    Which takes me back, I suppose, to where all of this started. What comes out of all of this is a reminder to remember that the audience’s understanding of the world and mine are not precisely congruent, that the things I take for granted in my writing may be strange and jarring and incorrect to a reader. I’m not happy to get a bad review, of course, but I do appreciate the reminder. It’s a good one, and important, and appreciated.

    Y’all know what I mean? I thought so.

    Related Posts

  • In Memory Yet Black and Twisted

  • EARLY MOTHER’S DAY FICTION

    SNAPSHOTS: 20th Century Mother Daughter Fiction is an anthology I edited with the extraordinary Joyce Carol Oates. It was a joyous experience and, for those who might be interested, it remains in print. Here’s the story I wrote for the book:

    “Everything Old is New Again

    by Janet Berliner

    “Thank you for coming.

    “Yes, brunch was a good idea, wasn’t it? Thank you for coming.

    “We’ll get together soon.”

    “Thank you for—”

    —Leaving. Thank you for leaving. Don’t call me, I’ll call you. Jenny shut the door, leaned against it, and stared at the label on the last of her birthday gifts, the one still wrapped, the one she’d steadfastly pushed to the end of the line, like the pumpkin people inevitably insisted upon piling onto her Thanksgiving dinner plate.

    The parcel was from her mother. At eighty, her handwriting remained clean and firm. Old Doll it said next to Contents. Value: Zero.

    Like me, Jenny thought. Value: Zero. Contents: Old.

    “Everything Old is New Again,” Peter Allen sang at her from her stereo set. She removed one fashionable black high-heeled shoe and hurled it at the CD player, uncaring of the damage she might do, though of course she’d care later. She always cared later.

    “Everything old is old and getting older, you sonofabitch,” she said. Old or dead. Like Peter Allen who was dead, who had written the song as a tribute to Judy Garland, who was dead, too. Her face lived on in reruns, her voice in recordings. But she was dead just the same.

    “Everything old is new again.”

    Jenny didn’t sing along or think kindly of her friend Harlan whom she generally loved and who, seemingly a hundred years ago, had introduced her to the song. Instead, she drank the rest of her birthday champagne straight from the bottle, using it to swallow her last available dose of St. John’s Wort, which was supposed to cure her depression but so far hadn’t done a thing for her except make her itch. Then she curled up on the sofa with the leather bound special edition of Anna Karenina several of her friends had clubbed together to buy her because they knew it was her favorite book and because she was a writer. Or used to be.

    One shoe off and one shoe on, she fell asleep. The phone woke her. She thought about letting it ring, but the residual hope that it might be her daughter changed her mind. It was the same hope that had sent her to the mailbox all week to retrieve cards from old friends with old lives, an ad for plastic surgery, a coupon for pizza, obligatory greetings from her doctor and her dentist.

    Her hand hovered over the receiver. Maybe this year, this special year marked by her half century, her daughter would remember. Maybe, like a chrysalis, she had emerged from her Yuppie cocoon and become a caring, mature adult. Right. And maybe Jenny would fly to Vegas and win the Megabucks, or her publisher would offer her a million dollars to move to New York and become the darling of the Literati, scribbling away at the story of her miserable little life.

    Which, she reminded herself, hadn’t really been all that miserable. At least not all of the time.

    She could probably even persuade herself that her present life was acceptable if they could only all forgive each other — her daughter for Jenny’s treachery in insisting upon being a person, and she for her mother’s — what? She’d hated her mother forever, and she couldn’t remember why.

    “Happy birthday, Mrs. Tobias. And how are you today?”

    Disappointed, angered by a series of political calls, sales calls, “We’re doing a quick survey” calls, Jenny Tobias felt less than generous toward this one. “If you’re trying to sell me something, save your breath,” she said.

    “This is something you need, something everyone needs, but most especially you now that you’ve entered your golden years.”

    “My golden years? You must have the wrong Jennifer Tobias.”

    “You’re fifty, Mrs. Tobias.”

    This was a new wrinkle, maybe not one that showed on her face, but a new wrinkle nonetheless.

    “Here in California we care about our senior citizens. We can provide you with a plot…”

    “There’s something my editor would appreciate,” Jenny said. She disconnected the voice and laughed at the state of her universe. She hadn’t been able to write in a year and she’d finally been offered a plot. Only it was the wrong kind of plot. It was true what they said. Be careful about what you wish for and never fail to be specific.

    On the other hand, maybe she had become a dinosaur. Maybe it was time to think about taking the big dirt nap?

    She was a storyteller, born of the Diaspora into a long line of bards, but if she didn’t find a plot soon — the writing kind — she might as well be dead.

    She wasn’t sure of much, but she did know that she did not love the new disposable society in which she lived; she did not love arthritis, or the fact that she was growing old. What she did love was Ibsen and Tolstoy, the look and feel of new yellow pads, the smell of newly sharpened pencils. Nor did she want much, just someone to give her back the wasted hours, for in regretting them, she had gained nothing and wasted more of the precious moments of her life.

    She’d already lived for half a century and so what? She hadn’t written the Great American Novel, she was neither rich nor famous. Jimmy Buffett had cashed in with Pirate Looks At Fifty; Jong had turned facing fifty into a raging success.

    All she was doing was getting older. She needed rejuvenation, a young lover, adventure, perhaps a return trip to Jerusalem and another camel ride.

    She’d pack a single suitcase and leave all material things behind. After a lattè, a couple of cookies, and a quick trip to the drugstore for more Wort. After she’d called her daughter to say she’d forgiven her.

    After she’d opened the parcel from her mother.

    Which she might as well do now. Now was good. Now was fine. There’d never be another now, at least not exactly like this one.

    She sat down and, balancing the gift on her lap, tore at the brown paper wrapping and lifted the lid of an old shoebox.

    Happy birthday, Puppele, the note inside read.

    Jenny flinched. She’d always hated being called Puppele, little doll, though why it distressed her so she had no idea.

    I found this in an old suitcase and crocheted a new outfit for her, the note went on. I would have sent it to a doll’s hospital for repair, but there aren’t any around anymore. Perhaps if I’d had it repaired for you years ago, right after I retrieved it, things might have been different between us. Truth is, I put it away and life intruded and I forgot that I had it. Now you are decades older than I was when it all happened.…

    The doll lay wrapped in a small, pink, satin-bound woolen blanket. Jenny removed it gently from its cardboard coffin. She opened the blanket and, operating through her fingertips like a blind person, caressed the porcelain. The doll’s hands and feet were chipped. Cold. Frostbitten. A few tiny sprouts of hair grew around the fringes of a jagged hole which exposed an empty, hollow head.

    The face was a Dorian Gray wreckage. Shattered. A baby’s face, ravaged by layers of fine spider-web cracks

    Crying, Jenny cradled the doll. Then she pillowed its head upon Anna Karenina. Seeing the juxtaposition, she picked up the brown paper wrapping and began to write…

    Cape Town station. Winter cold and draughty on a June day in 1943. A child, her curly head lowered, her green eyes closed, sits on a bench marked “Whites Only.” She is hugging a porcelain doll with short, curly brown hair. The doll is her best friend.

    “Won’t be long, Puppele,” her mother calls out.

    The child looks up. I am the child. “My name’s Jenny,” I whisper. I stare at the words on the bench, distracting myself by sounding them out. I’m a precocious child. At almost four, I can sound out the words, but I don’t begin to comprehend their meaning any more than I understand what is happening on this strange day. My mother has abandoned the uniform of the South African reserves that she wears each day to her bookkeeping post at the Castle. She looks so pretty as she paces the platform, stopping every now and then to call me “Puppele” and hug me. Too hard. Too desperately. “He’s been in North Africa fighting the Nazis,” she says to me in German. “He’s been up there making it with some shiksa,” she will say later, when my eyes are closed and she thinks I’m asleep.

    We are waiting for a stranger called Daddy. Waiting to take him home to a table laden with homemade kuchen. I am waiting to find out who he is. I’ve never seen him before but he must be important because Oma, Grandma, crocheted a new dress for me to wear, a pale blue dress with a string threaded through the waist. I roll the end of it around and around my finger until the tip is cold and white and has no feeling — like the rest of me.

    I am supposed to be feeling something, aren’t I?

    Something.

    “Can you hear it? It’s coming. The train. Come over here. No, stay there.”

    Mutti is shouting, primping, crying, laughing.

    The train pulls into the station. Leaning out of the window waving a doll as big as I — with long blonde hair and an organdy dress and bonnet — is a big man. Smiling, he climbs off the train.

    I struggle to find the concrete that’s there somewhere below my white button-down shoes. The man is with me before I reach the ground.

    “You must be Jenny.”

    He crouches down, takes away my old doll, the one I love, and places the big new doll in my arms.

    I start to cry. The new doll is a stranger, like he is. I want my old dolly back but I don’t know how to tell him. The new doll is shiny and cold as my mother’s face. The man speaks and she listens.

    “How are you, Greta? Well, I hope.”

    He has not kissed me or my mother. He has not hugged us, touched us.

    “No, I’m not coming home,” he says. “Not now. Maybe not ever. I have an — arrangement. A nurse. We met in North Africa.”

    Jenny wanted to stop remembering. She got up, showered, made coffee to which she added a dash of brandy, but there was no escaping the story; it was like a physical presence, demanding her attention. Giving in to its urgency, she lit a candle against the waning day and sat down to watch the rest of it play out in her memory. United with the child she had long since buried, Jenny reexperienced her own pain. The pain that had caused her to hate her mother. The ache that had told her that her mother would have liked to throw her away so the stranger would stay and love her.…

    “So it’s out with the old and in with the new,” her mother screamed. “You think you can do that? Abandon me? Or is it the responsibility of having a child. Do you want me to throw her away like an old doll? Like this?”

    In a fury, she ripped Jenny’s best friend from the man’s arms and tossed it away. It flew through the air toward the train, which was slowly moving out of the station, smashed against it, disappeared.

    If only she’d known that her mother had gone back to the station and retrieved the doll, Jenny thought. If only she’d been given the chance then to forgive her, to love her.

    Crying softly over the lost years, Jenny picked up the doll. Cradling it in one arm, she picked up the phone and dialed her mother’s number. “I love you, Mutti,” she said.

    “I love you, too, Puppele,” her mother responded.

    “I know you do,” Jenny said. “I’ll call you soon. I promise.”

    She replaced the receiver in its cradle and started to walk away. Darkness had settled on the world outside and the candle she’d lit was fluttering and almost burned out, but there was enough light to dial her daughter’s phone number.

    “Forgive me,” she said, when her daughter picked up the phone.

    “For what?” Her daughter’s voice was tense with negative expectations.

    “For whatever it is you think I’ve done,” Jenny said lightly. “I do love you, you know.”

    “I love you, too.” The voice was tentative, but it was a start. “Happy birthday, Mom. I have news for you. I’m going to have a baby. A boy.”

    “Congratulations,” Jenny said. Ask his forgiveness early, she thought. But she didn’t say a word except goodbye. Then she flooded the room with light, reset the CD player, and sang along with Peter Allen, because even if he was dead, she wasn’t.

    As a matter of fact, she was very much alive and everything old was new again. Maybe she wouldn’t ride any more camels, but she wasn’t ready for that big dirt nap yet, not while there was living and writing left undone.

    Hell, if she played it right, she might even have time to inadvertently do more things for which she could ask forgiveness.


    Early happy Mother’s Day to all, and my warmest wishes to Frank and his family. -Janet

    Related Posts

  • The Ghost Who Loved Books

  • The Filth and the Fury

  • Elizabeth Bear - 7th

  • Unsolved Mysteries

  • The World of Serious Writing Confuses Me

  • And now for something completely different (Romantic Times)

    by Alexandra Sokoloff

    I have to warn you, this month’s post is going to seem a bit radical to some of you. You may even feel, well, horror, at what I’m about to tell you.

    I’m going to talk about my secret favorite convention. And no, it’s not WHC, or WFC, or World Con or Horrorfind or DragonCon or any of those.

    It’s the Romantic Times Booklovers Convention.

    (I’ll wait for the gasps to subside…)

    But I think it’s important for people in the mystery, thriller and, yes, even horror genres, to hear this because Romantic Times is a convention that probably is not on the radar for other genre writers – but it should be.

    Let me make this perfectly clear. I never read romances as a kid, or any time after – I had less than zero interest, although looking back I can see there was some romance crossover in the Gothic thrillers I gobbled up in my endless quest for the supernatural. And it’s that crossoverness that definitely makes Romantic Times a more obvious bet for me than a balls-out horror writer, because paranormal is so huge right now – in romances AND mysteries, and though a lot of paranormal seems to be about warm and fuzzy werewolves and endless variations on quirky vampires, there’s also a significant segment of the paranormal readership that likes a good straight-up ghost story.

    Now, if you are writing balls-out horror, this is not the place for you. But if you are writing comic horror, erotic horror, horror/mystery crossovers, horror/thriller crossover psychic detectives, ghost stories, fantasy thrillers or, bluntly, if you are a female author, period – you might want to pay some attention, here.

    What you’ve probably heard about RT – if you’ve heard anything at all – is that it’s that it’s full of women dressed as vampires and fairies, and half-naked male cover models slinking around. Well, you would be right. But there’s a lot more to it than that.

    I heard from almost the very beginning of my promotional efforts that I should go to RT because I write sexy and I write paranormal, and because romance readers simply Buy Books. In fact, they Buy Books voraciously, which I discovered when I went to my first romance-centric workshop in the fall, Heather Graham’s Writers for New Orleans and sold more books to an audience that didn’t know me from Adam than I had sold at several other genre conventions combined.

    But the thing that stunned me from the very first moment of the Romantic Times convention last year was how incredibly professionally and logically organized RT is. It’s put on by the Romantic Times review magazine and it’s very adamantly a fan conference. Even though there are lots of aspiring authors there, and great programs for them, this conference is a goldmine for published authors because there are so many people there just to meet authors and buy books (well, okay, and attend the endless and amazingly fun parties, which I’ll get to…)

    And here’s my main point. I think we all, admit it, can be a little snotty about our own genre, and look down on writers who write and readers who read things that we wouldn’t necessarily read or write ourselves. But romance readers buy more books than any other single group of readers and they do NOT have the same prejudices. They love reading, they love authors, they love books. Period. Give me THAT reader any old time.

    I am frankly staggered at how smart this genre is about marketing and promotion. RT really works to recruit and organize a thriller track and a mystery track (track = a series of panels and events in that genre), alongside their bookseller track, a huge paranormal track, writing tracks, and breakout (how to get an agent/publish) tracks. ITW (International Thriller Writers) and various mystery groups work well in advance with RT planners to organize outside book signing at the truly lovely Murder By The Book bookstore bookseller events (last year the fourteen thriller writers chipped in to host a breakfast for all 75 booksellers in attendance at RT, where we did a meet and greet and gave out promotional material and books. 75 booksellers at once – think about it…).

    The conference also features some unique ways of handling reader/author interaction. Apart from outside bookseller events, there is only one mass signing – that takes place in a HUGE convention room on Saturday, after all the authors have already done their panels. The book fair is heavily promoted to the community, on radio, TV and in print, and lots of readers turn up just for that. The authors are lined up alphabetically at long rows of tables, and the readers just walk up and down the aisles. There are drawings for dozens of author-donated gift baskets going on throughout the whole three hour signing, and video screens project book trailers through the whole event as well (THAT was fascinating, and this year I was excited to have both of my book trailers playing in the book room and on the hotel TV during the convention. And yeah, you bet that sold books for me this year, and beyond that, was putting my name and my book titles out there for the entire convention, so that even people who would never buy what I write are now aware of me as an author.).

    Another cool feature of RT is “Club RT”. Throughout the convention, in the dealers’ room there are a couple dozen little café tables set up and authors are scheduled for one hour slots where they just sit at these tables and anyone who wants to can come up and chat, get books signed, etc. If I were an aspiring author I would have spent half my time at this conference just going around to chat with different authors in my genre. A truly unique and intimate opportunity for authors, aspiring authors, and fans.

    Of course a feature of RT I really love and am thrilled to be able to participate in is Heather Graham’s Vampire Dinner Theater, an original musical review written by Heather and her longtime, comically brilliant collaborators, writer/director/performer Lance Taubold and writer/manager/performer Rich Devin, always featuring several of Heather’s charming and multitalented offspring. Last year the show was “Vampires of the Wild Wild West”; this year it was “Blood and Steel, a Pittsburgh Monster Mash,” in which I was tricked out as a kinky Bride of Frankenstein, and F. Paul Wilson played Riff Raff, the butler – belting out an insane version of Hotel Transylvania).

    I also have to say, when women organize these things everything is just – prettier. The attention to detail is staggering. Promo Alley, where authors put out their postcards and bookmarks and giveaways, is a long aisle of covered tables on both sides, and instead of having people just throw their swag on the tables, all the giveaways have to be in displays or decorated baskets. Yes, that takes an extra hour of prep time, but oh man, is it worth it. You can actually SEE the promo stuff, and you get a feel for each author from the decorations of the boxes and baskets. Brilliant idea.

    Ditto with the parties. RT has professional costumers/decorators who dress the ballrooms for the theme parties – Moulin Rouge, Midnight at the Oasis, Vampires of the Wild, Wild West, Immortals of Rock and Roll, the Golden Age of Hollywood and of course, the Faery Ball. There is lighting. There are trees. There are enormous Moroccan pillows. There are stage backdrops. There are mirror balls and candles. There are screaming mechanical skulls. And the level of personal costuming rivaled the Renaissance Faire events and special effects masters’ parties I’ve been to in LA (I never even dreamed there were so many variations on fairies. Seriously…).

    And these women DANCE. All night. I’m sorry, but you can only talk so much. You get out on the dance floor with a bunch of readers screaming “It’s Raining Men” and you have made friends for life.

    And the point of the parties, is, of course, that they attract fans. Boy, do they.

    If this is all sounding a little estrogen-heavy, you’re right. But remember – women buy books. And male authors are catching on to the gold mine of readers to be - mined - at RT and are coming over to the decadent side. This year F. Paul Wilson and Barry Eisler were featured authors (Joe Konrath dropped out at the last minute… terrible drag) and I expect that more and more men are going to be realizing what an advantage that Y chromosome gives them in a situation like this.

    And well, okay, I admit it – all professionalism aside - after years of having to put up with only female strippers at Hollywood events, I like the turnabout of having half-naked beefcake at a convention.

    Sue me.

    Related Posts

  • Crossing Genres, Part One (Left Coast Crime)

  • Thrillerfest

  • WHC Is Bleeding

  • On the Road Two

  • Personality

  • Nesting

    During the last few months of pregnancy, usually around the fifth but sometimes as late as the eighth, a woman’s nesting instinct kicks in.  Some primitive switch hidden deep inside the female brain flips, and the most laid-back woman suddenly becomes Robo-maid; cleaning, rearranging, putting away, and throwing out.  Childproofing and smoothing all the rough edges of her environment.  Home becomes not just a place in which to live, eat, sleep, and watch Big Brother, but a place of warmth, safety and security for the expectant mother’s child.  Though the actual birthing is most often done in a hospital room in our developed corner of the world (and a less warm and comforting environment I cannot call to mind, except perhaps a mortuary), it wasn’t so long ago that Nesting also meant creating a comfortable, calming place to drop your little bundle of joy.

    The Nesting Instinct is not unique to human women.  Rodents and rabbits will seek the lowest sheltered spot they can find in which to nest, dogs will favor an empty box, cats will find a crawlspace or the far corner beneath their favorite human’s bed, and birds, who should conceivably already have a nest, will simply refuse to leave it.

    The Nesting Instinct fulfils two obvious functions; to give the mother-to-be a comfortable, homey place in which to perform the physically and emotionally stressful act of giving birth, and to give their new life a safe place in which to be born and grow strong enough, eventually, to leave.

    I suspect that most women will disagree, perhaps militantly, with the comparison I’m about to make, but since I think the analogy is a good one, and because I’ve already dedicated three paragraphs to it, I’m going to carry on.  Please direct all hate mail to David Niall Wilson.  I happen to know he adores it.

    I’ve heard it said more than once that writing is like giving birth, and in all but the physical sense I think it’s true.  It certainly can be painful (if only emotionally), exhilarating, frightening, and at its culmination, baring a miscarriage, one of the most satisfying experiences in the world.  It’s a long way from bringing a real life into the world, but it is something.

    Like the expectant mother, the expectant author should find a comfortable place to gather their will, focus their imagination, and begin their long labor.

    To the non-writer, a writer’s peculiar rituals must seem both eccentric and egocentric.  I know they do to my family and my wife.  My habit of Nesting is one I know the rest of my family just doesn’t get, which is why, I think, the garage I spent a summer converting into my writing office is now more family room than sanctuary, as much my wife’s office (probably more, considering the amount of homework she does there) as it is mine.  Consequently, as Spring’s playful glances toward this cold patch of the Pacific Northwest become longer, steadier, and the evenings are approaching a near-tropical fifty-degrees, I’m beginning to contemplate reviving my outside office, the one which saw me through my most productive writing season ever.  A few years ago, from late Spring to early Fall, I managed two novels and a few short stories in that outdoor office, which consisted of an old loveseat, its ripped upholstery covered by a demoted comforter, a small end table with an AM/FM radio, and my laptop.  Under the cover of the back patio roof, and still too close to the high traffic back door, I managed to make myself a fantastic nest.

    I doubt if I’m unique in my preference for the outdoor nest, but I’m willing to bet I’m in the minority.  The majority of writers who have described their nests to me paint a quaint picture of the quiet, dark room, seldom, of ever, visited by friends and family; a solitary place reflecting the inhabiting writer’s tastes.  A place where the laboring artist can work in mostly uninterrupted peace.

    Sounds nice, but alas, such has not been my experience. 

    It is possible to work without the benefit of the private space and closed door, but (once again, this is only my experience) having to work this way isn’t ideal, and anyone unwise enough to rouse me from my work is likely to experience the occasional, grumpy outburst.  I’ve seen laboring cats do the same thing to a person unwise enough to poke their faces in too close to a dark, under-bed nest.  Having been dragged up from my creative doze more than once to find a curious face hovering over my shoulder, I have to say I sympathize with the cat.

    If the private room behind a closed door is simply not a possibility, you must at least try to find some other comfortable place, and do your best to convince the non-writers you cohabitate with to respect that space, at least when you happen to be occupying it.  If you are going to be productive, you’ll have to convince them to respect you enough to give you some privacy while you give birth to your new masterpiece.  Unfortunately, this might necessitate the occasional scratch or bite (metaphorically speaking, of course – actually biting your significant other falls well beyond the range of acceptable eccentricity), but if that’s what it takes to convince them you’re serious, and if they are going to be persistent enough in their disruptions to warrant such action, you’ll just have to bare your teeth and do it. 

    It beats the alternative.  I’ve been desperate for privacy in my time, but never desperate enough to set up office in my dirt-floored crawl-space.  Hopefully, I never will.

    Brian Knight

    Related Posts

  • Tight Squeeze, Cool Breeze

  • The Filth and the Fury

  • Clutter

  • A Christmas ghost story

  • GREAT WRITER MYTHS # 1: If the Editor Says Your Story Sucks, He’s Really Impressed

    by John B. Rosenman

    In the spirit of public service to writers everywhere, especially beginners, this is the first in a series of fearless exposes of GREAT WRITER MYTHS. Illusions may be nice and comforting, but they have a downside: they can blind you to reality and prevent you from coping with it. For a writer this can be particularly deadly and pernicious. Thinking that stuffed, DOA turkey you wrote is actually a living, champion thoroughbred about to win the Triple Crown will never enable you to develop as a writer and achieve your potential, which is possible only if you try something which you do have some talent for and were meant to do, like collect stamps, be a serial killer, or run for high public office.

    This month’s myth came up a few months ago on one of the loops I frequent. Someone was saying that even negative criticism from an editor or publisher was good because it showed he had noticed you and that you had made an impression. In return I wrote, “This is often, perhaps usually true, but not always. I have received personalized rejections savaging my stories and ripping them apart.”

    Folks, I thought I had made my case. However, the bloke at the other end wrote: “If you get personalized rejections, YOU HAVE ACHIEVED A CERTAIN LEVEL.” He added, “I was in a writers group . . . and whenever someone received a response, it was cause for celebration because we usually just got form rejections . . . If someone takes the time to send you a personal note, it’s because they think you have potential and believe you should keep writing.” In fact, you should consider personalized rejections as a encouragement from “the publishing world” that “You’ve come a long way, and are almost there.”

    Okay, I remember that for years when I started writing, all I received were form rejection slips. I’m sure most on this site have had a similar experience. You might even get to the point where you’d be happy just to see a scrawled “Thanks” or “Up Yours” on one of those forms. Under the circumstances, we can understand why a writer, especially a desperate, beginning one, would look forward to and treasure even the most casual response or recognition of his existence from an editor, why he would embrace even the most tenuous sign that a real live human being existed out there who had actually taken a few minutes to read his words and respond. But folks, while a reply, even a negative one, OFTEN implies something positive, and suggests that you may have climbed out of the great unwashed multitude of writers and achieved some small degree of distinction, it does not necessarily mean that. To think otherwise is to embrace a delusion and an illusion about the submission process, and friends, my conscience would not rest if I did not put this mischievous myth in the crapper where it belongs. Call me a mean-spirited killjoy if you like, but thinking a slap in the face is actually a flirtatious come-on will only prove a liability. Ultimately, it will weaken rather than strengthen you.

    I can already here someone say, “But why deny a writer what encouragement he sees? Why take away what hope he has?” To which I would respond, “Didn’t you read the previous paragraph?” Getting published and achieving success as a writer is difficult enough; when you form a habit of grossly misinterpreting editors’ words and signals, it becomes immeasurably harder. Reading the situation for something else than it really is will only handicap you because it separates you from reality and makes it impossible for you to learn from what editors actually mean and improve your writing on the basis of it.

    To be honest, I don’t know how much a problem this Pollyanna attitude toward negative feedback is. Perhaps I’m making a big deal out of a small one, and clutching at editorial straws is a tendency that afflicts only the terminally desperate. Assuming it’s a genuine problem, though, here are five things that such writers should remember.

    1. These days, more and more editors/publishers are commenting on writers’ work anyway. This is largely due to the fact that magazines and publishers are paperless and do their thing increasingly online. Everything’s cheaper: space, layout, and TIME. When all you have to do is type a few words and click Send, you’re far more likely to comment on that story you hated. The sanguine writer I mentioned earlier wrote that editors “are basically business people and have no time” to send comments they don’t mean. Well, when a response is just a key tap or a mouse click away, they often do.

    2. If the editor’s review is relentlessly negative and/or vicious without any mitigating features, such as an invitation to send more of your work, then you can probably bet he’s not interested in a second date. In other words, don’t assume he’s aroused and wants to play bump and tickle just because he responded.

     3. Some editors are mean, negative, overly critical. It’s their nature to see warts on everything and to praise almost nothing.

    4. By the same token, some editors are kind-hearted and positive like Paula Abdul and  praise too much. They don’t want to hurt your feelings but may unintentionally do something even worse: lead you astray by sending the wrong impression. I mean, what part of the word REJECTION don’t you understand?

    5. Finally, lest I’ve created the wrong impression here, often editorial feedback is indeed a positive sign that you have registered on the editor’s radar. Especially if it’s a prozine with a good reputation or a respectable, advance-paying publishing house, the reader may be justified in feeling encouraged. And if the editor/publisher invites you to send more, then yes, the rejection might be a golden opportunity. On such occasions, NO might imply a possible future YES.

    At any rate, I know that all readers’ comments on this essay, whether pro or con, will be an affirmation not only of my insight, genius, and writing abilities, but of my humanitarian concern for writers everywhere. Even if you appear to be negative and rip my opinion and words to shreds, I will know your true sentiments. And if you happen to edit a decent magazine – well, my story is already in the mail.

    That’s it for this month, friends. Tune back in May, when I will expose and explore GREAT WRITER MYTHS # 2: Writing for Storytellers Unplugged is Not Only a Fast Track to Fame and Glory, but Will Ensure That You Always Have a Hot Date on Saturday Night.

    Related Posts

  • Editorial Input

  • Fictional Lives – Up and down like the Assyrian Empire

  • A Writing Experience that Didn’t Involve Writing

  • What Do You Want To Do? The Creative Enigma

  • A Short Field Trip

  • Conventions and You

    This week is the annual GAMA (Game Manufacturers of America) Trade Show in Las Vegas, and for the first time in memory, I’m sitting here at home instead. I have many reasons for this.

    First, of course, is my family. I’ve been off to Hollywood and Sweden already this year, and tossing another trip on top of that would be a bit much. I used to travel a lot more before my wife and I started having kids, but with five little ones tromping around the house, getting away means having to pull many more scheduling contortions and outright acrobatics to pull such ventures off.

    Second, I’m busy. Too busy to leave town right now. I was up until 3 AM this morning, beating a comic-book script into submission, and its lucha libre tag-team partners are straining at the ropes for their chance at me next.

    Third, I have more offers for work these days than I can properly field. Since I’m a freelancer, I’m always looking for more. I keep a steady eye on that event horizon out there on the edge of the roiling seas. You know the one. It’s labeled “Last scheduled deadline.” Once you go beyond that, well, Here There Be Dragons.

    Fourth, these things cost money. As a freelancer, I’m run a small business, a.k.a. my career. I’m happy to invest in attending a convention if there’s a remote chance it may pay out in the future. I’ve built much of my business on good relationships with friends and coworkers, and while it’s always a good idea to keep those fields freshly watered, I need to keep an eye on expenses too.

    Fifth, GTS is all about tabletop games, and I’m mostly working on novels, comics, and video games these days. I’ll always go to the Big Daddy of gaming conventions—Gen Con—but everything else comes farther down the list.

    So, I’m staying home. If you’re interested in making or selling tabletop games—or anything else in that market, including tie-in gaming fiction—I recommend the show to you, but you won’t see me there.

    In general, conventions—literary, gaming, etc.—are wonderful when you’re starting out in any career. You get to meet all sorts of like-minded people and try to figure out how you can all make a living together. You make the kinds of friendships and contacts that will serve you well throughout your career. You live a little and have some fun so you have something to write about later.

    Later, though, conventions become a way to catch up with those now-old friends (the friendship is old, not you, right?) and pass on something of what you’ve learned to the next crop of fresh-faced optimists ready to storm the walls. You sit on panels instead of attending them, and you spend as much time at the show’s Bar Con as you do in the exhibit hall.

    The value of the show changes. You don’t stop learning, but you don’t learn as much. The curve flattens out as you go, and you wind up treasuring the friends you see more than the event you’re all nominally there for.

    Still, I’m always looking for new horizons, new edges of the world that I can sail over—or off. While I may not be at GTS this year, I’m already making plans for events in the newer fields in which I work, like Comic-Con and the Austin Game Developers Conference and the rest.

    And hopefully I’ll be back next year. While I always like to make new friends, I miss my old ones too.

    Related Posts

  • Geeks of All Stripes

  • Lemme In!

  • … revisions which a minute will reverse.

  • Mixing business and pleasure for fun and profit (hopefully)

  • The Zen of Conventions by Sephera Giron