I never used to read books on writing. Which, coming from a contributor to a blog of essays on writing, may seem as unlikely a confession as a chef saying she never reads cookbooks.

It was a purist form of bias: The only meaningful way to learn the craft was to do it, then let the open market thrash you about the head and shoulders with your own rolled-up manuscripts until you cried. Repeat until improved.

And once I stopped blubbering and started getting acceptance letters, well, what would’ve been the point of prepackaged advice then? My boat was finally afloat.

Now, the bruising path of submission-and-flagellation is still, inescapably, the chief form of apprenticeship, but I’ve relaxed the stance on the rest. Look at it this way: What surgeon, mechanic, code monkey, or marketing agent relies exclusively today on an initial skill set picked up years or decades ago? And who, in any cherished pursuit, is really better off regarding everyone else’s experiential insights as if there’s nothing to learn from them?

It isn’t a matter of writers not knowing how to write. It’s more that we can find it easy to stick close to the habits and ruts that served us well early, and became as comfortable as extra-fleecy Underoos. Sometimes that’s a great place to be. Sometimes its limitations chafe.

But a worthwhile book on writing can pull off the same trick as any other worthwhile book: broaden your perspectives and expand your understanding. If you find the right one. When you’re ready for it. Which can be a challenge. Visit the reference section of a well-stocked bookstore and you’ll find enough trade paperbacks on writing to choke a hippo. Some are generic and average, and some invigorating and revelatory. An old bromide about wheat and chaff comes to mind.

Submitted for your approval, then, an armful of author’s helpers from which most writers should be able to derive something of value. Not a best-of list, necessarily, just the best ones I’ve encountered so far.

The Elements of Style, by William Strunk and E.B. White. Yes, the enduring classic that launched thirty million bleary-eyed collegians. Except I read this only within the past couple of years. Sure, it was assigned in one of my university classes, but by then I’d been winning and placing in school lit-mag contests for five years, so what could it possibly teach me that I wasn’t already doing by instinct, right? And then there was the slacker atmosphere perpetuated by the not-entirely-engaged professor, who looked and even sounded like Robert Mitchum, only shorter, and uttered a gem so sparkling that I’m still waiting for the right work in which to use it: “I started going to A.A. because I could never find my car on Sunday mornings.”

Turns out these Strunk and White fellows were onto something after all.

Their slim volume is stuffed with time-honored guidelines for achieving clarity and precision in prose. No more, no less. The contemporary reader might notice a bit of creakiness here and there, but still, knowing the rules is always the best precursor to breaking them.

Spunk & Bite, by Arthur Plotnik. Plotnik, author of The Elements of Editing, one of MacMillan’s companion volumes to The Elements of Style, rounds up a bunch of the dynamic duo’s mandates, flings them into the air like clay pigeons, and takes a shotgun to them.

It’s not quite as iconoclastic as it sounds. Plotnik clearly thinks Strunk and White’s rules are important, but that there can be plenty of justifications for breaking them … and he furnishes evidence that E.B. White ignored his own advice on occasion, and his work was all the better for it.

Plotnik’s assertion is that, in a world increasingly full of distractions, with attention spans as fragmented as cable TV bandwidth, it behooves savvy writers to amplify their signals to better compete with the noise. To use language in ways that will surprise and delight the reader. To make sure their words don’t lie flaccid on the page or screen, but sproing out to smack the reader in the eye.

This goes not just for fiction, but also articles, essays, reviews, blogs, op-ed pieces, e-mail, memos … pretty much everything but tech writing and obituaries. Plotnik covers around 30 elements of language use, and cites examples from a panoply of writers and sources — effective illustrations of the chapter’s topic, usually, but he tosses in the occasional clunker, as well, so one can learn from the toppled face-plants of overreaching writers.

Fortunately, Plotnik never forgets there’s an appropriate time and place for what he advocates, and realizes there’s a fine line between energy and obnoxiousness … even if a handful of his approval-stamped examples had me reaching for an airsick bag.

Chances are, you’ve already made some of these tactics your own. As for the rest, there’s probably too much here for any one writer to realistically incorporate, but that’s the modular beauty of it. Explore what resonates and jettison what grates on your sensibilities. At the very least, Spunk & Bite should inspire you to take a fresh look at your style, and if it’s been feeling anemic lately, suggests how to furnish it with a shot of adrenaline and a tank of nitrous oxide.

On Writing, by Stephen King. “A Memoir of the Craft,” this is subtitled, and while it’s half-autobiography, half-manual, the blend works seamlessly. In the interest of full disclosure, it’s been a long time since King the Novelist has grabbed me the way he once did. But King the Memoirist has held me rapt and fascinated twice now. He’s so informal and comfortable here it really is as if the pages dissolve and you’re sitting down face-to-face with him. And if you don’t think there’s anything you can pick up from one of the world’s top-selling authors, I can only wish you a pleasant stay in that ivory tower.

The Writer’s Journey, by Christopher Vogler. If your work suffers from structural problems, this one may be able to help you pin down what’s missing and what’s going awry by using time-tested strategies going back … well, back to prehistory may not be overstating it.

Vogler takes Joseph Campbell’s classic on mythology, The Hero With A Thousand Faces, extracts the core elements that underlie countless myths and fables from around the world and throughout the human timeline, and shows how they work together to form a kind of master storyteller’s template. These include both the 12 stages of the hero’s journey and 7 character archetypes that populate the story.

If that sounds like a straitjacket that will leave you wriggling in a corner, trying to bite your nose in frustration, not to worry. Vogler takes pains to show how endlessly malleable it all can be, applying both the master structure and individual elements to a diverse array of films that would seem to bear no resemblance to one another at all.

Dare To Be A Great Writer, by Leonard Bishop. This one’s unlike any other writing book I’ve ever encountered. It’s completely devoid of linear structure. Instead, it consists of 329 mini-chapters on every conceivable topic, arranged as if Bishop pulled them one at a time from a spinning lottery drum. Start anywhere, stop anywhere, open it at random … it doesn’t matter. Herein lies wisdom. If you’re looking for something specific, the categorical index will help you find it quickly.

Bishop was born in the 1920s and emerged in the ‘50s, which may be why some of his examples seem a little dated, but most of the underlying lessons are timeless. Read it and be humbled. The man may well have forgotten more about the craft of writing than I’ll ever know.

Eats, Shoots & Leaves, by Lynn Truss. Time, said Woody Allen, is nature’s way of keeping everything from happening all at once. The same can be said of punctuation. Which you no doubt appreciate every time you try to slog through a web posting or e-mail retched up by some doofus who doesn’t know a period from a zit.

But who knew a book about dots and squiggles could be so entertaining? All your favorites are here: the firm period, the hesitant comma, the authoritative colon, the urbane and mysterious semicolon, and my personal favorite — o, be still my heart — the irrepressibly adventurous em dash. And if you feel like firing a howitzer whenever you see unnecessary apostrophes polluting the landscape — as in “Try our world-famous chitlin’s!” — you’ll have found a kindred soul in Truss.

Self-Editing For Fiction Writers, by Renni Browne & Dave King. It’s been claimed that if Hemingway were starting out today, he probably would never have made it into print. Because his early books, at least, required the kind of extensive editing that doesn’t happen much anymore. You can count on some leeway if you already have an existing relationship with an editor who’s waiting for your next book, but if you’re trying to breech that hermetic seal around her desk for the first time, your novel better be at least 96% ready to go. Otherwise, you’re only making it too easy for her to send out the bad new letter.

Hence the enormous value of this book, written by a couple of editors to give writers a better idea of how this alien species thinks. The problems they look for, how they might fix them, and how you can get your manuscript that much closer to perfection before it ever sees a real editor.

One caveat: This doesn’t cover the sweeping arcs of plotting or how to wrangle a storyline. The book takes for granted that you already know how to tell a story. Instead, it gets down to the nuts-and-bolts of showing-versus-telling, crisp dialogue, prose rhythms, weeding out redundancies, achieving the proper balance between elements, and more.

Your mileage may vary — mileages always do — but for my money, this is the single most valuable book in the lot, at least for those who already have their writing chops down.

Elmore Leonard’s 10 Rules of Writing, by Elmore Leonard. I don’t put this here out of any towering merit, and don’t even agree with every rule, but it’s the only writing manual around that you can read in one standing. Not sitting, standing. Right there at the bookstore shelf. Even if you have gout.

The pages are thick cardstock, and many are given over to illustrations. Most of the other pages have no more than one paragraph, sometimes a single line, or even just a couple of words. Robert Rodriguez’s DVDs have his “10 Minute Film School” features…? Consider this the 10 Minute Writing School, if you don’t have time for anything more substantial.

*

Got any of your own recommendations? I’d love to hear about them. Because I have a little free bookshelf space that, with apologies to Strunk & White, ain’t doin nuthin.

Share/Save/Bookmark

This entry was posted on Monday, June 9th, 2008 at 2:51 am.
Categories: Writing.

13 Comments, Comment or Ping

  1. Robert Jones

    Elements of Style was also a required book in the college I attended, and it stood largely unread on my bookshelf for a long time. During a much-delayed read, I also found the information it contained surprisingly useful.

    In response to the well-presented information of your survey, I shall soon relieve the Amazon storage shelves of several books. Thank you.
    RCJ

  2. You’ve hit some of my favorites: Elements of Style, and Self-editing for Fiction Writers. For the writing life (and mania), I also recommend Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird. I laughed till I cried. Or maybe I was crying while I laughed.

  3. I liked On Writing, but I recently did a short review of it on my own blog showing that many of the things King claimed to be true about himself early on changed later in his life, and possibly a revision is in order. Also, the books he claimed as the truest renditions of his “method” are those that have garnered the least acclaim…Gerald’s Game being one.

    Good list. Haven’t read all of them - I don’t mind a book about writing as long as it’s also about the writer behind the writing. Sometimes the lessons between the lines are the best.

    D

  4. Brian Hodge

    >I shall soon relieve the Amazon storage shelves of several books
    Only NOW does it occur to me that I should’ve tried to set up a kickback arrangement.
    >I also recommend Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird
    Thanks. I’ll have to look that one one.
    >many of the things King claimed to be true about himself early on changed later in his life
    Just read your piece on that. Interesting how he deviates! Almost like, well, over here is my ideal, and then over here is the reality of things…

  5. Try John Gardner and Ayn Rand. Also The Transitive Vampire. The recent Great Writers on the Art of Fiction: From Mark Twain to Joyce Carol Oates (Paperback) is fun and informative. I agree with you, Dave, with the exception of Strunk & White, I do like to learn about the writer. Good blog, Brian. –Janet

  6. Would’ve said I never read books on writing either, but was surprised to read your list and realize I’d at least looked at most of them. The ones that attempt to codify observed conventions, i.e., them there grammatackle and such rules, are the ones that have proved most useful, if only so that I could enjoy breaking them. As for the rest of it, always felt that you can’t memorize the quality of “insight” from a book, or lead by following. But, of course, there are worlds of value that comes from shared experience and example. And this summation you give is of equal value, Brian…so thanks.
    – Sully

  7. I’ve read Strunk’s book, Eats shoots and leaves, King’s book but not the other ones.

    Thanks for a list of interesting books. I usually just gather my reading techniques from reading other books and carefully dissecting the sentence structure and such. I think just as much information can be found in reading the classics and modern books as can from some instructional book.

    Excuse the spelling/grammer. I don’t bother.

  8. Brian Hodge

    Janet: Thanks for the recs. The Gardner book is one I’ve meant to get to; didn’t know Ayn Rand had done one. And the Twain To Oates book sounds especially interesting.
    >always felt that you can’t memorize the quality of “insight” from a book, or lead by following.
    Can’t argue with you there, Sully. A lot of stuff is going to wash right over you with no sticking power. Still, I’m from the school of thought that says even if you pick up just one or two things that might not have occurred to you otherwise, that you’ll carry with you, it was worthwhile. Plus it’s pleasant breakfast reading.
    >I think just as much information can be found in reading the classics and modern books as can from some instructional book.
    Oh, more, no doubt … figured that went without saying. But I’ve come to find value in occasionally slipping in one of these nonfiction books, as well. Which isn’t to say anyone else necessarily has to.
    >Excuse the spelling/grammer. I don’t bother.
    Mmmmyeahhh … that’ll serve you well… ;-)

  9. All great suggestions, Brian. I have several of the ones you mentioned and they are very useful. Let me also suggest -
    not as a “how to” but as a book to inspire and encourage when we’re feeling less-than-hopeful as a writer - “Art and Fear” by David Bayles and Ted Orland. Not a fluffy feel-good book but one that genuinely looks at the creative arts (which can be painting, writing, music) and shares valid, valuable encouragement to those who work in the arty trenches.

  10. I’d also recommend (for newer writers, especially) “Don’t Murder Your Mystery” by Chris Roerden, “Editors on Editing” and “On Writing Horror.” But Strunk & White is the starting point! It took me about 10 years to figure out compound modifiers.

    Scott Nicholson

  11. It made my heart warble to be in the company of these select writing guides and to be reviewed so keenly,so kindly by Brian. I thank you and salute your group and its insights. If there’s any room left on your shelves, I suggest GARNER’S MODERN AMERICAN USAGE, not a how-to, but a treasury of smart advice and modern examples for every usage issue. The author is another Brian, but spells his name Bryan (Bryan A. Garner).

  12. Brian Hodge

    Thanks for the continued recs, Scott and Beth. ART AND FEAR sounds like one to have on hand for THOSE times. Kept behind a little door in the wall, you know … “Break glass in case of emergency.”
    And Arthur! This was a surprise. There’s a special queasy feeling that comes with discovering this piece was read by an editor/writer mentioned in it. I can only hope you were reading without a blue pencil.

  13. I have copies of all the books that Brian listed. I read books on writing as a reminder of things I may have forgotten. So far my favorites (other than the ones already mentioned) include Rebecca McClannahan’s Word Painting. I have always felt that description was one of my big weaknesses. And Noah Lukeman’s First Five Pages.

Reply to “Eating My Words, One Bookful At A Time”