It’s In The Connections
We’ve touched on this subject here in a number of different ways, but I thought I’d revisit it because the point has been driven home to me very recently. I’ve just finished re-reading “The Green Mile,” by Stephen King. I listened to the audio book, read by Frank Muller, whose voice I love to share miles and hours with. It’s a familiar story, but every time I go through it I find something new.
What struck me while reading this time was a connection that I hadn’t made before, and this sparked thoughts about the connections are words make with readers. They can be very arbitrary, very powerful, and are almost always different from reader to reader. While the overall reaction to a work can be the same through groups of unrelated readers, the individual connection points will always differ.
I started thinking about this as King described Mr. Jingles the mouse. This is an amazing mouse; he chases thread spools and walks all over arms and legs as if on cue. I have never had the slightest bit of trouble picturing this, but it occurred to me this time through that there’s a reason for this.
When I was young, living with my mom and my step-dad, an abusive, drunken barber, we had no pets. This changed dramatically, and left me with all the surreal baggage most encounters with my stepfather did. What he brought home, for reasons I’ll never understand, was a mouse. The mouse was brown with a sort of square nose. His name was Henry, King Henry VIII actually.
Officially the mouse belonged to my brother and me. We had a hanging rod along one wall for our clothes, and above this we had several shelves – plywood on angle irons screwed into the wall. We cleaned off part of the bottom shelf and put Henry’s cage there. That was the start.
I’d like to blame all that came after this on Bob, my stepfather, and his odd, controlling ways, but I can’t. Henry was no ordinary mouse, nor was those that came after. For one thing, from the start, if you called him, he would come to the door of his cage and get into your hand. When he was joined by a couple of other mice, we found he had figured out how to lift the door of the cage and hold it open for them to escape. He liked ice cream, but if you gave him chocolate, which he hated, he would pick up his dish (an upside down milk carton top) – carry it to the edge of the shelf – and drop it over the side all over our clothes.
Henry was followed by Princess, who grew enormously fat and mostly sat; Agatha (Aggie) who had asthma and used to ride on my mom’s shoulder, even when she went to the store (and once on an airplane flight) tucked up under the collar. I don’t have anywhere near enough space here to detail the oddities of these pets, or the oddities of our treatment of them. My mom worked for a university food service, and she knew veterinary students. We had some of the mice “fixed” which is tricky business for such a small creature, and when some of the mice developed tumors, they were operated on (successfully in most cases, I might add). If my mother could have gotten an inhaler for Aggie, she would cheerfully have done so and would have hovered around worriedly waiting for it to be needed.
So, the point is when I read about the mouse in The Green Mile, I took it all in stride. The other day I thought about this. I wondered if someone who’d never had any real experience with mice except to kill them in traps, or to see them in a pet store, or to feed them to a pet snake, would react as I’d done. I wondered if the mouse would be as important to such a reader, or if they’d be able to suspend their disbelief in the same way. I also noted that I’d gone into a daydream and probably missed a few details of the story as I thought about our mice, King Henry and his progeny, and how the university wanted to bring them in to study because they exhibited such intelligence.
I think all readers have moments like that. The words they are reading find a nerve and when it’s plucked, memory pours in. This changes the course of the act of reading in subtle ways, and becomes a moment that is now part of the reader’s life, and memory. Clive Barker once wrote that “we are all books of blood,” and he’s correct. We are also books of memory, and those memories are attached to nerves that interact with every moment of our lives.
I hope I didn’t miss anything in my brief daydreaming period, but even if I did, I got a few moments to relive things that were formative, and to look at them in a different light. It made me wonder about what I write, about scenes from my own life that I try to imbed with certain emotions with the hope of invoking planned reactions. Do I ever get that just right, or do the memories invade every time and make a new story, a story that is as unique to each reader as it is to me?
It’s all about connections, you see…
Share on TwitterIf you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
Gary Braunbeck’s KEEPERS did that to me. The images just keep on keeping on. Good essay, Dave, and congrats on finishing your Nano novel. Helluva job. –J.
Nope, Terese, I’ve moved on to children, a dog, a cat, and a rabbit (who was supposed to be a DWARF bunny, but that’s a different story). No mice since childhood.
Thanks guys (and Janet for the nod on the novel) I enjoyed writing this one because it was a “found” essay, driving along, listening to the audio book, and “connecting”.
D
The way each reader connects with a piece of writing is eternally fascinating and exciting. I’d also go so far as to call it sacred–something which shouldn’t disturbed the writer. If someone takes something a certain way, I believe that is the way it IS (for that reader). When the writer points out, hey that’s interesting, but I meant [fill in the blank], something vital is destroyed.
It is true what you written. When plots speak to us of things that may have occurred in our lives, we tend to feel its nostalgic essence.
David, I was curious if I can buy your books and have them inscribed to me?
Of course you can…visit my web site http://www.macabreink.com and somewhere on there there are links to buy most of my books. I usually have some up for auction also…
D
Amen with the connections. We hope they are there for readers of our works just as we hope for them in the works we read.
I love stories set in small towns, for example. Of course, they have to have the feel and smell and taste of small towns…
Beth
I at one point had a collection of 43 pet mice. Yes, I thought it’d be fun to get a boy mouse and a girl mouse and see if they made babies. Oh, yes, they did.
None of mine were special, though. All they ever did was pee on me.
Beth…I really wish you’d read my story in John Pelan’s new anthology, “Lost On the Darkside.” It’s titled “The Call of Farther Shores,” and it goes back to some of my own small town beginnings…in fact, so does my novella from CD - “Roll Them Bones,” which is set in “Random, IL” — and of course, you’re going to love the ending of DEEP BLUE when you read it (if you didn’t already) because it has small SMALL town — and a Sineater (grin)
Nicely done, David. I feel very much the same about music, drawing connections to time and place and points in life. It’s a powerful tool if you can reach out and help the reader make those connections of their own. Score one for Mr. Jingles!
Yep, I’ve felt that too, Steve…there are songs that invariably bring particular images and scenes from my past into sharp focus…
It’s the ones that nag at me and don’t quite bring it all back that help me write…
D
Dave…I’m reading Deep Blue now.
Excellent stuff! I’ll report back when done. And I’ll watch for Lost on the Darkside (I’ll be hanging in a Barnes & Noble almost all day tomorrow…maybe they’ll have a copy I can pick up. Sounds great!) I do love a good small town story or scene!
Beth



Yep, oftentimes a writer can set up all kinds of associations in the reader’s mind. For example (King again), in IT, his description of the river and the “standpipe” in Derry immediately put me back in a certain place from my youth, and so many of the visual details, no matter how King described them, took me to the old setting I used to know. I’m sure that did color the way I saw that whole novel, which was mostly favorably, perhaps moreso than it shoulda.
But that’s what brings any story alive — touching the reader’s nerves so that he’s a willing partner in a shared experience. It’s when the reader becomes an unwilling partner that the writer needs to worry.