Love’s Secret Domain

In college, my roommate Steve and I used to interview bands for the on-campus radio station, and by our senior year, we’d gotten pretty jaded. We’d had milkshakes with Mr. Bungle and sushi with Shonen Knife, and when the Revolting Cocks needed a keg in their dressing room, or Nivek Ogre was freaking out on a layover at LAX, they knew whom to call. But when I finally got a chance to talk to someone from the last band on my list, I was physically afraid of picking up the phone.

Only a handful of people I’ve met have ever heard of Coil, and of those unhappy few, the ones who can stand them at all are, generally speaking, a bunch of perverts and gluttons for the most inscrutable brands of weirdness. With songs like “Anal Staircase” and “The Sewage Worker’s Birthday Party,” they left no uncertainty about where their heads were at, but their albums included copious liner notes detailing the arcane inspirations for each song, from the base pleasures of ergot poisoning and chili torture to L’Autreaumont’s proto-surreal Maldoror poems and Alfred Jarry’s absurdist Ubu plays. Clive Barker’s first choice to score Hellraiser, the band were axed by producers who thought their music was too sinister for a movie about torture-fetishists from Hell. His blurb on the vinyl release of the soundtrack said it all: “The only band whose music I’ve ever had to take off, because it was making my bowels churn.”

The video Coil’s Peter Christopherson made for Nine Inch Nails’ Broken EP was a mock-snuff home movie so unflinchingly realistic that Interscope shitcanned it and snuffed its release. Surely, they couldn’t actually harm me through the phone, and if they tried any mind control techniques, Steve would restrain me from doing anything crazy while under hypnosis. But I still had that delicious thrill you get as a kid, just before ringing the doorbell of the scariest house in the neighborhood on Halloween night.

This lasted about a minute into the interview.

John Balance was a soft-spoken, shy interview subject, but soon warmed up and commenced blowing my mind with astounding anecdotes and tidbits about the band’s various fetishes. Late in the interview, I paid him what I thought was a compliment in praising their genius for capturing evil in their music, and asked about how they approach making music that made people so uncomfortable.

Balance was silent long enough that I worried that he might have hung up. Finally, he said, in a slightly hurt tone, “We always tried to just make music that was beautiful.”
It took me a few moments to ride out the satori he’d planted in my undercaffeinated brain and recover the thread of the conversation, because he’d got me to thinking about the funhouse mirror quality of the artist’s intent, and about how much more profoundly disturbing evil can be, when it seeks to be beautiful.

This simple statement explained for me why I was drawn to qualities in art and literature and music that sat mostly, but not easily, within the fantastic or experimental domains, and nailed a common thread. Suddenly, it made sense why so much of horrific entertainment, in setting out to be scary or grotesque, merely turned out ridiculous, or ugly. That profound chill, that sense of haunting that separates Val Lewton’s Cat People from other drek in the same vein, for instance, is the same wild hair that made lifelong schizophrenic Adolf Wolfli’s collages of soup cans in 1910 so much more meaningful than Andy Warhol’s contrived pop art renditions of same forty years later. It’s in the mystery that drove Wolfli to try to communicate something of almost mystical significance with, among other things, Campbell’s soup cans. It’s what makes Henry Darger’s tortured Vivian Girls epics so much more edifying––and terrifying––than Lolita or any other art that dares to try to explain why some adult males are complete freaks.

The most resonant entertainment for me out of that time and since, not only revered the awe and beauty of the unspeakable, but which gave the antagonist something more to play with than just coming back from the dead and fucking with people. Clive Barker’s “In The Hills, The Cities” blew my mind around the same time, because the monstrous titans of the story were not out to crush and destroy; this was a traditional Communist picnic outing gone awry, and the crazy beauty of what they were trying to do shone through the story and made the monsters something to weep for.

John Balance died a few years ago, having pretty much ruined his health chasing after a penumbral beauty that looked, to everyone else, like the polyp-pocked haunches of Hell. I think that, ever since, I have had quite a lot of quality horror ruined for me, because so many seem to try too hard to be scary or gross, when the stuff that continues to send me is informed by a borderline psychotic compulsion to revel in how beautiful darkness is.

Related posts:

  1. I Love Cheese
  2. That Love/Hate Thing
  3. That Old Devil Called Love
  4. Gorilla, My Love
  5. I Shall Tell You A Great Secret

Share on Twitter

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

Wow, Cody, I really have very little frame of reference for the music or content you wrote of. I can, however, appreciate the ideas behind beauty being what makes evil scary. Yes. I think you’ve touched on a real truth there. I was rereading Lord of the Flies the other day, thinking: This is true horror to me, even though most would never classify it as such. Your essay touches on part of the reason, I think.

A lot of poison for thought, Cody. How would you classify “A Clockwork Orange?”

Eric, “Lord of the Flies” is most definitely horrific.

–Janet

Hi Eric… Coil’s an acquired taste the same way snakehandling is… you’re either going to put it down right away and wonder what anyone could get out of it, or you’ll be whipping the snake around your head, screaming, “Bite me! Bite me!”
I’d agree that LOTF is certainly horror, but I’ve not read it in a while… is the slip into savagery endowed with a real sense of beauty or intensity, a revelation in the descent (return?) to the mindset of the jungle?
Janet: Clockwork is a paradox for sure, in that Burgess threw everything he had into making a youth culture as ugly as humanly possible. Apparently, he made himself sick to read it afterwards, but Alec’s gleeful elan, and the depth of expression the Nadsat slang lexicon gives the narrator, totally conveys the kind of unsettling joie de vivre that makes it more than just ugly, but a monument to ugliness.

“A monument to ugliness.” A perfect summation. –J.

Thanks for starting your exposition where most analysts leave off. This is an intensely intelligent look at bedrock psyche. You give me room as a reader, and it’s where I want to stand in order to be me but still recognize truths that are not me. And it’s why I prefer Dostoevsky to Tolstoy (LN).

–Sully

Doesn’t everyone prefer Dostoevsky, Sully? J.

A really thoughtful, illuminating essay. A few thoughts ran through my head when I read it (and usually I don’t have thoughts at all ;).

Isn’t Satan more terrifying because he was once an angel, is a fallen, once-blessed creature of light? We see the ever-so-faint remnants of supernal beauty that compound his evil.

In Mario Praz’s masterpiece, THE ROMANTIC AGONY, we have headings that directly bear on your subject: THE BEAUTY OF THE MEDUSA, THE SHADOW OF THE DIVINE MARQUIS, LA BELLE DAME SANS MERCI. Love those Femme Fatales.

I once published a story in which I tried to capture the most evil, chilling, and disturbing thing imaginable. Its title: WHEN A ROSE SINGS. A rose is already so beautiful, that augmenting its beauty by singing is, well, evil and scary.
Give me ordinary petunias any day.

Sully: Thanks, man. When I have to do lit crit, I try to approach it from a view of, “I don’t know good, but I know what I like, if not why.” Trying to figure out why some things stick with me seems to lead to more interesting ideas than trying to establish an objective criteria of “good.” And… Fyodor es mas macho, verdad.
John: Absolutely right. Satan is the ultimate archetype of debased beauty, and I think attempts to make him ugly or bestial miss the point, perhaps deliberately…
Your story idea rings true, too… that factoid about cut flowers releasing a chemical scream was enough to convince me to only give my loved ones hamburger for Valentine’s. And roses really do try too hard.
Incidentally, the title of my essay was cribbed from the title of Coil’s best album. The title track was a deliciously sleazy cabaret-on-acid number that begins with lyrical lifting from Blake (”O rose, thou art sick”), and oozes into a chilling riff on Orbison’s In Dreams that makes Dean Stockwell look like Pat Boone (that is to say, at least 25% less creepy, by volume).

I am SOOOO envious right now, after reading that bit about sushi with Shonen Knife.

What, did you get to go to a one-act play with Laurie Anderson and hit an opera with Jane Siberry, too? (Okay, yes, showing my musical biases.)

Seriously, though… I loved the piece.

Cody - This essay hit me in the chest, hence my heart. Brilliant. An essay I’ll carry with me for quite sometime.

Thank you.

Fran

Cody - The reference took me back to my early reading days when Coil’s Hellraiser soundtrack was on the stereo and it took months or even years to find that elusive American import I’d read about in a horror fanzine or even Fangoria… getting wrecked to the sounds of Mr. Bungle after hours and hours of drinking etc. Brilliant!

Cody –
Thanks for hitting the hail on the head and driving it home. Yeah — beauty is what makes the bomb explode. Everything else is just smoke.
C. Michael Cook

That’s the precise reason why Nick Cave’s And the Ass Saw the Angel sticks to me like a sick-dream. That there’s ‘comfort in the ruin of it’.

It’s one of the reasons why Clair Denis’ Trouble Every Day is a movie I can watch almost all of in my head despite having seen it exactly once, when it was new.

Now I gotta go find me some Coil.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)