Mysterious Butterflies
By
Richard Steinberg
Picture the child Einstein mentions in the open of this piece. For the first time, standing in the doorway of a great library like that in
Chalk another one up for the followers of 510-G13.
But we have to try.
Clean miss. Galaxy D.H. Lawrence had no effect at all on Mr. Zern. He came, he read, he yawned.
Or not.
The Gemini Man met almost all those criteria, enough so that it should have had a real chance to change some minds, influence some hearts, touch some souls. But after having labored and fought and bled and created my lungs out, it was, in the end, misunderstood.
A Conservative columnist trumpeted it as: “A brave new voice in the conservative struggle against moral pluralism.”
A Liberal columnist called it: “A long overdue tribute to liberal values and perspectives, and an indictment of conservative pseudo morality.”
In fact, it was about none of those things; and when I look up into the midnight sky, I can just see the disappointment in 510-G13’s eyes. And in the mirror as well.
And I failed at that, for the most part.
As we will all fail most of the time.
But when we succeed, when we reach that moment of critical mass when what we have to say is what our readers hear . . . my God, how unbelievably spectacular it feels! More than making up for the failures, the near misses, the false shots, the abject shortfalls. It feels as though God has leaned close to whisper in our ear, his lips barely touching as he says: “You can rest now.”
At least for a moment.
I want to thank all of you – our gentle, curious and so contributing readers - for your comments, probes, stabs, and compliments. You make the website as much as those of us who write here do.
But, as I gear up for year two, ESO 510-G13 taunts me in the night asking if anything I’ve written here has risen to that galactic level that is our duty to at least aspire to.
“Although the dream is a very strange phenomenon and an inexplicable mystery, far more inexplicable is the mystery and aspect our minds confer on certain objects and aspects of life. Psychologically speaking, to discover something mysterious in objects is a symptom of cerebral abnormality related to certain kinds of insanity. I believe, however, that such abnormal moments can be found in everyone, and it is all the more fortunate when they occur in individuals with creative talent or with clairvoyant powers. Art is the fatal net which catches these strange moments on the wing like mysterious butterflies, fleeing the innocence and distraction of common men,” Giorgio de Chirico
Or galaxies consuming other galaxies to make a more beautiful world.
Believe!
Related posts:
- The Gonquin Table: If The Truth Be Known
- The Gonquin Table: Friday the 13th
- The Mobility Of Truth
- The Peace Of Wild Things
- It’s not Jazz This Time, but…
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Comments
Dear 510 G13, if we are kindred spirits — and indeed we are — I have benefited from your celestial voyage like hitchhiking ESO. Thanks for sharing your bountiful energy, Rick.
And, yeah, I wish people were less shy about posting comments. I can tell you from the drill-down in the stats, however, that there are a lot of reads of every column. In fact, as Frank could tell you, reading the stats is an art form in itself that doesn’t tell the full story. Even so, stargazers come and go, but the stars remain in the firmament for future stargazers, just as readers come and go while your works remain on stage for future readers.
– ESO Sully,
(Thomas Sullivan)
SLAM!!!
Once again Richard Steinberg’s writing changes something in me.
I wish I could write like him… and not only because I’m his big sister.
As a writer, it’s easy to forget to inject passion into our writing, and when we fail to do this, we can’t always figure out exactly what’s wrong with our work. It doesn’t sound or feel quite right, but we don’t know why. We tear sentences apart, dissecting and mutilating them, trying to get them to ring true, when all the while, our only sin was that we forgot to invest ourselves passionately in what we were doing.
Beautiful post. Thanks!
C. Milton Campbell
http://www.writerinside.com
That was amazing….and think of this.
Atoms have a very solid nucleus, and a lot of space. There are “shells” of electrons surrounding that nucleus. You can shoot electrons at an atom all day and it’s like shooting at a bowling ball in the center of a fog bank…you aren’t likely to hit the bowling ball.
BUT…
If you manage to shoot a photon into an atom and hit an electron with the right charge on it, you can shoot two photons back out, which hit other atoms, and in a matter of seconds, you have the intensity of a laser.
We shoot photons at atoms for a living. When the charges are right, and we strike that electron, that’s when the world should look out…
To judge from the notions expounded by theologians, one must conclude that God created most men simply with a view to crowding hell.
–Marquis de Sade
Ah, Richard, where to begin?
Saying the essay was great is trite and redundant. But it was. As yours so often are. There are lines in it to stop a locomotive. Lines that pull you up and make you think.
For instance, “I want them to hit with such closeted force that they destroy preconceptions, obliterate ill-conceived judgments, and reduce to ash hatreds and misconceptions based on ignorance.” I like that line. But fear it. Because it reeks of an arrogance that the judgment being obliterated is ill-conceived. But is it always so? Mein Kampf was a 510 G13. It obliterated everything in many people’s path. Das Kapital was a 510 G13. It, too, obliterated. And yet, I now of what you write. I, too, want that passion to permeate my work. I, too, have the arrogance to believe that my world view trumps all and that what I write will enhance the human condition. But what if I am wrong?
For instance, “But we have to try.” I like that line, too. No. Wrong! I love that line. It is the essence of writing. Regardless of whether our notions are well or ill conceived, they are our notions, and if we believe in them we must try to imprint them on humanity. Even though it makes us the suicide bomber of our own Jihad.
For instance, “If you want to be worthy of being called a child of 510-G13, you will put truth in your writing. Not necessarily arbitrary truth, and often not even your own truth, but real truth based on your characters’ realities and your story’s requirements.” But the truth is that your character’s realities and your story’s requirements are a manifestation of a deeper truth. Your truth. My truth. Whatever truth we as writers know as we hammer the words from our subconscious and onto the page. So, in the end we cannot hide behind the façade of a character and claim that we are being true, for it is we who crafted the character and his truth is our truth.
There are more–many more–lines in this piece that resonate. But the truth that comes at me like a sixteen wheeler down life’s turnpike is that you have written it with passion to generate passion in others. Nice job.
Frank
Andy Fellows,
As someone who has read SU from the first day, I can only say this. Every single day I open this webpage I learn something about life and writing. All the articles bring something new to the table - EVERY SINGLE DAY.
I can’t even begin to explain how important this is to me as a mere layperson who loves reading and writing.
I don’t normally post cause I have trouble getting the thing to save onto the site and frankly I feel completely out of my depth but today I had to chip in.
Richard - even if you only reach one soul with your words, that is the most remarkable achievement…
And I’m sure there are a number of people like me, who come here EVERY SINLGE DAY.
Beautiful essay and to all of the rest of you, please don’t stop.
Ta
Frank, you bastard (lol)
Now I have “Animal House” stuck in my head…
To mangle the quote to my own purpose:
“Mr. Steinberg, what are you doing writing about MY truth?”
“I’ve been thinking about that, Mr. Hand. If it’s YOUR truth, and it’s MY truth, doesn’t that make it OUR TRUTH?”
“Mr. Steinberg, you are correct. Class…gather round. Mr. Steinberg has brought some truth for us all…”
D
We have another winner, Vegas Rick.
How you unwind your soul in such poignant fashion and lay it bare for all of us to see, I will never understand. I crane my neck to look up there, you know. Bravo, maestro . . .
But the Marquis de Sade?
Stan
Rick — wonderful, as always, and you can be assured that you words here don’t stop at being merely meaningful; not till they hit inspiring, as a rule.
Love the de Chirico quote; his art has inspired me as well, from the time I was a kid. One of my very earliest memories is a nightmare based on one of his images.
This one:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/damnedrodan/chirico.jpg
–M
Rick — Love the notion of a writer as a kick-ass galaxy striving to wake up other galaxies and make them new. Or maybe “wake up” is the wrong phrase. Shake them silly and bring them alive, shake them out of the lethargy of old, dusty perceptions.
Galactic rewrite . . . yeah, that’s what we do or try to do. A “good read” is nice, but a “stellar” read, ah, that’s the ultimate goal.
Wonderful as usual. I look forward to your second year, but your first will be damned hard to top. But you gotta try, don’t you?
BTW, I didn’t know that LADY CHATTERLY’S LOVER was about pheasant-raising. Damn. I gotta read it.
I always feel better after reading your essays. Your contributions are one of the main reasons I remain involved with SU…I feel honored to be in your company here.
Beth






Wonderful essay. Talking you into joining SU was everybody’s gain. Your essay about Gloria, your mother, was my personal gain. It enabled me, after eight years, to write about the death of my mother, something I thought I could never do. For me, that was a galactic event and I thank you.
Janet