Last month, alert readers will have noticed that my post was conspicuous by its absence. My excuse is a good one: an utterly ghastly bout of stomach flu. Trust me, you don’t want to know what I was thinking about on May 29.
This month, I find that I’m envying my fish.
I have an albino bristlenose plecostomus–which isn’t nearly as alarming as you think, since the maximum size these critters reach is four inches and they are vegetarian, subsisting mainly on algae. I don’t know whether mine is male or female, as it is still juvenile; we’re still waiting to see if its going to sprout that Lovecraftian crop of tentacles. Its name, insofar as it has one, is Childe Cthulhu, which in the twenty-first century I think qualifies as unisex. But in any event, I have a (currently) two-inch fish. It lives in a five-gallon tank on my desk and spends its life assiduously cleaning its environment–which in fact it is doing even as I type this. As multicelluluar organisms go, it’s a pretty simple one, and I feel certain that unlike the centipede of the notorious dilemma–and unlike me–it never overthinks.
I intellectualize everything. And while mostly this works in my favor, there are some critical issues on which it constitutes FAIL. One of them, with which I have been wrestling for most of a year, is the process of writing short stories.
I only figured out how to write short stories in 2000, and I had a good run (thirty-two short stories sold, my bibliography tells me) with, you know, no more traumas than any other part of my writing career. And then I started working on a short story called “The Hostage Crisis on the Derelict Mistral Freighter D35-692N-C, Queen of Liverpool,” and the whole thing collapsed, as Eddie Izzard says, like a flan in a cupboard.
It took me three tries to finish it, and when I did, it was lifeless. I whinedtalked about it with my husband and with my writing partner, and finally figured out what was wrong, but when I went to try to rewrite it, like the centipede, I discovered that I had forgotten how to walk.
Theories of expertise talk about moving from unconscious incompetence to conscious incompetence to conscious competence to unconscious competence. But my problem is that I seem to have gotten two of the steps reversed. I’ve moved from unconscious competence to conscious incompetence. Because the stories that I wrote prior to this crash and burn were not incompetent stories: the slew of reprints in various Best Of anthologies reassures me of that. And it wasn’t that I wasn’t consciously working on my craft when I wrote them; “Draco campestris,” to name just one, is all about the conscious craft. But there was something I was doing that I wasn’t thinking about that was simply, painlessly working, and when it stopped working, I couldn’t find a way consciously to fix it.
Which means, of course, that I can’t stop thinking about it. Obsessing, even. And I know intellectually what’s wrong. Something has shifted so that my brain is presenting me with story ideas theme-first. And what I fail at, again and again, is translating that thematic idea into a viable story. If I get the story first, the theme takes care of itself, but this is breach-presentation, and thus far I have not found a mental equivalent of a Caesarean section.
(Interestingly, I have managed to write a few short stories since the crash, and what they have in common is that their structure came predetermined. Ghost stories have a pattern.)
This is frustrating. I like short stories. I like writing them. I like the sharpness and crispness of them; I like the way I can hold them in the cup of my palm. I like the fact that I can finish a short story in less than a week . . . when I can finish one at all. And it’s frustrating because my brain, lacking traction, continues to spin its wheels, thinking about something that I’ve already thought into a limp and wrung-out rag. And yes, I’ve tried writing without thinking about it, which (a.) I can’t do and (b.) you don’t want to see the results.
I can’t solve it by thinking, and I can’t solve it by not-thinking, and while I wait for some third solution to present itself, I sit and envy the small, simple life of my fish.

6 Comments, Comment or Ping
Cynthia Armistead
Writing good short stories isn’t easy, but I’ve enjoyed yours greatly. I look forward to reading more of them.
The fish picture link is giving me errors
The page for the albino bristlenose in general is here, and a photo with the tentacles is here.
Jun 29th, 2008
Thomas Sullivan
If intellectualizing is your algae, have you tried changing your diet? I guess you’re saying that you did in a couple of ways, but your strengths are your givens, so I’m wondering what you perceive as your weakest point. Maybe that should be your starting point. Emotional impact? Gimmick? Deus ex machina? Come up with a crackerjack version of your most iffy element that turns you on, and you know you can pull off the rest of it. It’s obviously in you — you’ve done it so many times before — so it must be getting snowed under by that cerebral overkill you referred to. Kind of like golf. The more you think about it, the worse you play. Hell, even your column has nice circularity to it with its personal introspection swimming in a metaphor. So count that as a successful short story. Hmmm. How about writing your short stories like they were columns?
– Sully
Jun 29th, 2008
Janet Berliner
When that happens to me, I almost inevitably find that I’ve been mistakenly been trying to make one or more of the characters obey the tenets of the plot. They’re pouting; saying, “I wouldn’t do this, and I wont.” I also often find that my opening is wrong –that the story really starts in a different place. One more thing, sometimes two or more characters should be eliminated or merged.
–Janet
Jun 29th, 2008
Brit Mandelo
Oh, I know that feeling. Any time the brain gives me a theme instead of a plot for a short story, it won’t work. I absolutely cannot make it happen; the end result is lifeless, bland stories that meander all over the place.
My short story slumps, when they happen, are often solved by taking a rare break and reading my favorite stories over again, lovingly. It refreshes me. I then think back to that awesome theme and let it stay in mind while I wait for a real, workable idea to come over the transom. When it does, it usually includes the theme I wanted. (Ex:, wanted to write a steampunk story about AI-ghosts, but ended up writing a Victorian ghost story with inventions that was not steampunk at all.)
Jun 29th, 2008
Robert Jones
By now, you have more than proved your capabilities and should allow no doubts to permeate your thoughts. You really can stop them if you try by IMMEDIATELY, RIGHT AWAY, INSTANTLY shifting your thoughts to something positive. It appears you could also use some time away from all writing concerns to allow your mental slate to clear itself.
Bob
Jun 30th, 2008
Brittany Pritchard
Hello!
It’s been a while hasn’t it? I hope you don’t find it creepy I looked you up through Google. It just happened to cross my mind one day that I hadn’t read anything you’ve written a long while and I missed that. So, I looked you up and found a few magazines you’ve published in and this blog.
Anyways, your blog reminds me why I chose to study science and not English. My brain just doesn’t work for writing. It rocks at science though!
Take care of yourself.
-Brittany
Oct 13th, 2008
Reply to “On the Vile Habit of Thinking Too Much”